|
Post by lakotaman97 on Mar 8, 2020 9:54:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakotaman97 on Mar 8, 2020 9:54:52 GMT -5
High Backbone
|
|
|
Post by Dietmar on Mar 8, 2020 10:29:50 GMT -5
I´m sure you already figured that the first photo you posted is NOT High Backbone or Hump II. It is often published as Hump though.
There are many other portraits of Hump II, but this one is none of these.
|
|
|
Post by lakotaman97 on Mar 8, 2020 10:51:21 GMT -5
Yeah I knew they weren’t the same person, i am starting to think maybe Donovan Sprague is actually a descendent from the man in the the first photo and NOT High Backbone, I tried reaching out to Donovan Sprague to show him censes and all the information I have and of my great grandmother Vida High backbone but he’s pretty much looking at the messages I sent and ignoring them
|
|
ted
New Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by ted on Mar 9, 2020 9:40:59 GMT -5
When someone who is called a "Historian" contraddicts itself in numerous occasions about the same subject, should not be trusted any longer as a reliable Historian. Just my opinion
|
|
|
Post by Dietmar on Mar 9, 2020 9:51:23 GMT -5
lakotaman97,
I'm not so familiar with Hump/High Backbone´s family tree, so Donovin Sprague is a good choice to discuss with.
If you ask me, the first photo is not a Hump at all, neither Hump II (who is the man in the second portrait) nor the first Hump, who died too early for a photo of him to exist.
I can´t find his real name, but he probably was a delegate in the 1880s or 1890s, the way he looks (hence the medal around his neck).
|
|